Loonshots: Reader Reviews & Ratings

Loonshots
Loading…

Loonshots

Safi Bahcall

Write a Review

Your Review

0/500

Other reviews

24 total
Paris

Bahcall's distinction between P and S type loonshots explains why Pan Am failed while others succeeded, making this a vital read for leaders navigating innovation traps.

Winston66

This book taught me to look past surface failures and ask why tests failed before giving up on great ideas.

Taryn

Bahcall's framework on P and S type loonshots helped me understand why Pan Am failed while ignoring quiet strategic shifts.

Anabel

This book changed how I see innovation in my own team.

Sienna

This book changed how I see failed ideas.

Bobby

The Pan Am case study really hit home for me. It shows how past success can blind leaders to new strategies, making the Moses Trap concept feel very real and dangerous.

Daniela

Bahcall explains why Pan Am failed by ignoring quiet S-type loonshots while chasing flashy P-type tech, creating a Moses Trap where leaders become blind to strategic shifts needed for survival despite having brilliant teams and resources that could have saved them if they balanced both innovation types instead of doubling down on past successes.

Will

Great book but some parts felt a bit too technical for my taste.

Autumn

Beginner-friendly without being shallow.

Edwin23

The concept of false failures resonated deeply with my experience in tech startups. Recognizing that early test results might be flawed due to context or variables saves valuable resources and prevents us from discarding potentially life-changing ideas too early.

Conrad3

Bahcall's P and S type loonshot framework is essential for balancing short term wins with long term survival.

Ward

This book taught me why my team killed our best idea too soon.

Cole

The distinction between P-type and S-type loonshots changed how I view my team's recent failures.

Xavier

The Pan Am collapse example feels too harsh for a book that mostly pushes a single optimistic vision.

Chiara

The Pan Am story really shows how past success can blind leaders to the quiet S-type innovations they need to survive.

Rita

The Pan Am story really shows how past success can blind leaders to new strategies.

Glen18

I learned how to spot false failures and protect fragile ideas from being killed too early. The distinction between P-type and S-type loonshots is especially useful for understanding why some innovations fail while others succeed despite similar initial conditions. Understanding phase transitions and Dunbar's number helps me see how team size can accidentally kill creativity before it starts. The advice on separating artist teams from soldier teams gives a clear structure for balancing innovation with core business needs without letting either side dominate the organization entirely. Implementing these principles requires careful planning but the payoff of catching breakthrough ideas early is worth the effort.

Debra3

Bahcall explains how phase transitions kill innovation when teams grow too large.

Brody

While the science behind phase transitions is interesting, the advice feels too theoretical for busy managers.

Petra

This book changed how I see innovation and helped me protect my team's wild ideas from early rejection.