Chen Chunhua explains how 1990s China mirrors our current US struggles with value confusion and market pressure.
Economic Development and Value Choice: Reader Reviews & Ratings
Loading…
Write a Review
Your Review
0/500
Other reviews
31 total
The survey data from 1992 about young people in Dongguan really shows how fast values changed when the market started.
The 1992 Dongguan survey data showing only 30% linking self-realization to community contribution really hit home for me.
This book explains why I feel lost when chasing money instead of connection.
The survey data from 1992 really hits home about how fast values shifted when the market opened up.
This book helps me understand why my quiet quitting feels like a rebellion against a system that ties my worth to productivity.
This book helped me understand why I feel lost when chasing money, and it showed me how to find balance again.
The section on 1992 Dongguan surveys really highlights how fast young people turned away from community values.
Too much focus on China makes it hard for me to connect with the ideas.
The data on 1990s youth really shocked me, showing how fast values changed.
This book helped me understand why my work feels empty even when I earn more money.
Chen's data on 1990s college students shows how fast values shifted when money became the main measure of success.
This book helped me understand why I feel disconnected despite my job success.
The survey data from 1992 shows how quickly young people drifted from community values to self-interest during China's market shift.
The part about young people in 1990s China choosing self-interest over community really hits home for anyone feeling lost today.
This book helped me see why I feel lost between old values and new money, making my quiet quitting make sense.
Chen Chunhua explains how rapid market changes in 1990s China caused young people to lose old values, making them feel confused about what truly matters in life today.
Very interesting perspective on value choices.
The survey data on young people in 1992 shows how quickly values shifted.
I struggle with the idea that blind collectivism and extreme individualism are both equally harmful traps. The book suggests rational egoism as a middle ground, but Chen argues this is actually a fatal logical flaw because self-interest and collective good often conflict, like in climate change where one must be sacrificed. This leaves me feeling confused about how to practically balance my personal ambitions with the needs of my community without falling into either extreme or pretending they can always align perfectly.